Vitaliy Sachko vs Clement Tabur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Nov at 10:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
V. Sachko vs C. Tabur

UKR
1
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Sachko 1 - 1 Tabur
They have played 6 sets in total, with Vitaliy Sachko winning 3 and Clement Tabur winning 3. The last match between Vitaliy Sachko and Clement Tabur was at the Moselle Open - Metz, 06-11-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Vitaliy Sachko getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sachko | 1 |
| Tabur | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) Moselle Open - Metz(11-06-25)
(Q3) Moselle Open - Metz(11-02-25)
V. Sachko vs C. Tabur H2H Profile
V. Sachko vs C. Tabur Match Preview:
- Examining second serve performance over the recent months shows Clement Tabur narrowly leading with a 45.00% points win rate, compared to Vitaliy Sachko's 44.66%.
- In return games, Sachko holds the edge by winning 48.04% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Tabur achieves 46.54%.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Tabur slightly surpasses Sachko at 28.48% versus 27.83%.
- Under pressure, Tabur proves more resilient, saving 55.72% of breakpoints, a marked advantage over Sachko's 49.48%.
- What does their performance over the year indicate? Tabur has a higher yearly win rate at 68.57% compared to Sachko’s 58.23%.
- On their best surface, both players share a 59% win rate, with Sachko favoring indoor hard courts and Tabur excelling on hard courts.
- Despite Sachko having played more frequently in tournaments > $10K, Tabur shows a slight edge with his win-rate consistency at these levels.
- They've directly faced off once, with Tabur winning, indicating historical head-to-head dominance over Sachko.
- Why might deciding sets matter? Tabur boasts a higher win rate, at 71%, in deciding sets compared to Sachko's 65%.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Tabur has faced players with a slightly lower average rank, which might influence his impressive win rate.
- Consider their prior match duration, averaging over two hours, informing us that matches between them can be highly competitive.
Editorial Prediction (November 6, 2025, UTC):
In a prospective encounter, Clement Tabur appears to have a slight but significant advantage based on current performance patterns and their past meeting. Tabur's steady resilience in saving breakpoints is a pivotal strength, especially under intense match conditions.
Sachko does hold a slight edge in returning second serves, a factor that could disrupt Tabur’s service games. However, Tabur’s superior performance in deciding sets and historical head-to-head victory tilt the balance in his favor.
Given these insights, Clement Tabur is predicted to likely emerge as the victor in the upcoming match, leveraging his comprehensive gameplay and past success against Vitaliy Sachko.
Vitaliy Sachko vs Clement Tabur Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
V. Sachko vs C. Tabur H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 27 | Games Won | 31 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:7:18 | Average Match Time | 2:7:18 |
| 67% (115/171) | 1st Serve % | 66% (118/178) |
| 70% (80/115) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (93/118) |
| 54% (30/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (29/60) |
| 29% (4/14) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (5/16) |
| 31% (56/178) | Return Points Win % | 36% (61/171) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
V. Sachko Recent Matches Played
C. Tabur Recent Matches Played

V. Sachko vs C. Tabur Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.52% (367/271) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.24% (303/200) |
| 55.63% (820/654) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.96% (666/483) |
| 52.98% (7296/6475) | Games Win/Loss | 53.18% (5759/5071) |
| 56.31% (58/45) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.15% (86/44) |
| 58.16% (221/159) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.03% (177/113) |
| 57.89% (88/64) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.78% (40/42) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1417 | Aces Total | 1171 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1408 | Total Double Faults | 1149 |
| 1:21:29 | Average Match Time | 1:36:34 |
| 413.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.97 |
| 63% (21858/34865) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18751/30789) |
| 67% (14591/21858) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12622/18751) |
| 48% (6203/13007) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5971/12037) |
| 45% (1712/3776) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1531/3448) |
| 42% (14885/35435) | Return Points Win % | 42% (13335/31431) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.67% (15/21) | Main Tour W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 55.63% (163/130) | Challenger W/L | 50.34% (74/73) |
| 63.05% (186/109) | Futures W/L | 65.29% (222/118) |
| 58% (360/618) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (299/497) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (79/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (76/135) |
| 57% (121/211) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (83/147) |
| 87% (339/296) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (283/255) |
| 13% (339/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (283/28) |
| 23% (299/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (220/48) |